I Want Your High

As a designer, it's weird to learn that color blindness exists. It's a splash of cold water when you realize that the colors you took hours to choose are moot for some people. 

"This red is vibrant and matches the tone and feel of this company."

"It's gray." 

"Oh."

And then as I do, I started thinking about something else. In particular, how much of a sledgehammer some drugs are. We don't know how any one person will metabolize, react, or reject a drug. And it can be for a multitude of reasons. So we throw a quantity into their body, and hope that the result is sorta what we wanted.

So I imagine a world where we have implantables and finally fine-tune the delivery of drugs or even at that point, specific neurotransmitters to simulate the effects we want. 

Tie that back to getting high. A group of friends takes a drug, and all get high.

But like the color blindness -- sure they all may be getting the same color, but how that color is exactly perceived will vary.

I'm curious about a world where we can so precise that we can replicate the exact same high in different people. 

Today, it's "let's get high."

Tomorrow, it'll be "I loved Dave's high from October 2013. Let's do that tonight."

A world where we all see the same vibrant colors that we intended for each other.

Generational Blindspots

I like to call them "Oh, Grandpa" moments. Those moments when your grandpa says something sorta racist, or sexist, or just crazy, and all you can do is "Oh, Grandpa." He's a product of his time, he could only introspect what he knew to introspect.

On a broad level, his culture never questioned certain things, so those become blindspots the moment he interacts with those who have. 

It's hard to tell what my generational blindspot will be. We don't have all the answers, but it's been hard not to be exposed to many of the issues that exist today. Race, religion, sexual orientation, differently-ableness--they are all popping into the culture at some point or another.

But one that I think will be ours is digital ethnics. 

The idea of managing one's digital exposure and what we services we blindly enter into will seem ridiculous to the next generations. 

The idea that we so willingly use Facebook, and Linkedin, and Snapchat because they're free will make us seem so ignorant. 

"Blah, we used to just send a dick pic for free! Put a filter on it. Which was also free! We thought it would disappear, but they didn't. Oh well!"

Eventually we'll build infrastructure about the ethnics and morality of these services. In the same way that the Stanford Experiment prompted written consent and ethnic boards for science. We will resist them because they seem so slow and imposing, but I imagine when I make that rant--the kids will roll their eyes and say those magical words...

"Oh, Grandpa."

 

Alone Time

I still wrestle with alone time vs being social.

It took me a while to realize that there's an ebb-and-flow to both ends of the spectrum. And that both are needed.

But it's still hard to figure when to switch, and how to ramp up either. 

For example, right now, I'm realizing I'd like to be more social, but being in a new city--it's hard to ramp that up quickly. And then eventually I know, I'll want to ramp down, but then feel bad about breaking rhythm with people.

It's also hard to figure out how intense to go. It's nuanced to tell someone that you want like 20 texts, but 30 is way too many right now. It's to hard to say that I'm even that fickle to need that specificity. 

Maybe I'm over-feeling the disruption, and everyone already gets it. But I dunno because I already want alone time, so I'm not texting anybody right now. 

Or maybe I should??

People

Obvious statement day: people make the workplace.

The work only takes you so far. The "congrats" only lingers in your mind for so long. The commute always sucks. 

So it's the people you can shoot the shit with, eat lunch with, work with, joke with, borrow gum from. It's 40 hours a week. Liking the people around you is a nice thing to have.

But I suspect it can cut the other way. You like these people so much that you start making so-so decisions. You burn a bit more to save someone. You take on a bit more because you really don't mind. 

And you hope that these good people will do the same for you.

However, I think it why some people stay a little too long. Get a little too complacent with things that might be toxic. They get a few too many wrinkles in the process. 

That line is too blurry for anyone to make that call consistently. But I think it's worth keeping in-mind as we plan for the future.

I Think I'm Qualified

It's weird to say that I've been a professional for eight years now. It feels like yesterday that I was figuring out what a portfolio was. 

But I suppose I've grown since then. I've seen design problems come and come back again. I've seen bad people fuck up projects. I've seen how good-intended people still fuck things up. 

(Let's be real too, I've seen myself fuck up projects.) 

Learned to present ideas. Learned to generate ideas. Learned that hating those ideas is part of the process. 

Etc. etc. But I think what brings all of this to sharpest resolution is seeing the mistakes...I take that back--they aren't even mistakes... Mis-steps? Maybe well-intended attempts to find the path in others. 

I run into younger designers, and can sense the lacking confidence, or the brave face, or well the worst one, the hubris. And the instinct to just tell them. "Hey! Don't stick your finger in the socket son!" or "Hey! That visual system can't be properly coded by the dev team, and will fall apart in four sprints!" 

The huge caveat, of course, that it's not like I'm not prone to lacking confidence, or brave faces, or hubris. It happens. But I'm thinking that the growth isn't the exorcism of these traits, but rather the faster and faster detection of them. 

You know, hey I'm feeling something familiar... a bad familiar... oh! My finger's in the socket again! I should remove it from said socket. 

So grown up. So wise.

Definitions of Success

I'm realizing that people see reality quite differently at times.

This isn't a stunning sentence that will change the world. But it's a thing for me to really feel in my gut for the first time. 

Especially in a work situation when the importance of success is tantamount.

That when your team members don't even agree to what success is, then it's already uphill to agree what path to get there is. 

You would hope in an ideal situation that the differences contrast, and force us to dig deeper. And to figure out perhaps an even better definition.

But as it happens, egos and politics (and perhaps exhaustion) doesn't lead to the deeper conversation. Instead, it's a shallow "alright fine, let's just keep moving." Or worse, water cooler whispers and complaints about other team members. 

Toxic.

Corporate Acceptance

Having experiences in corporate life, it's been informative comparing it to the movies I saw growing up. 

Granted, my views are skewed by always being in the creative departments. I never really had to file TPS reports all day.

But you still get a very clear sense that you're a piece in a machine that's much larger than yourself. And all the frictions what come about when you start adding up all the people involved in a chain. 

Each person with different motivations, in different stages of their career, and different definitions of success. 

It all adds up to this feeling that you're the one out-of-place. You start thinking that people are less motivated than you. That they're settling down, or rushing up the ladder. Or even sabotaging you.

But I don't think it's ever that dramatic. And yet it's hard not to feel that way, that this great big machine is out to get you. 

It gets really fascinating when you see how all these people choose to react to this general culture. How they cope. Where they compromise. Where they make assumptions about what will "never change here." (These "solutions" seem like the things that really mess up your own goals and aspirations.) 

Now, it's not to say that I'd like a company of people who are fully the same. No, I would hope that the ideal is somewhere in-between. That the differences that arise result in better conversations and better debates and better solutions.

But there's a point of which the debates become dictates. And compromise become acquiescence. 

I can see why people go off to make their own companies and startups. And they hope the people they then surround themselves with match closer to their motivations, stage of career, and definition of success. 

Shaky Origins

In an effort to be socially-aware and inclusive, I've grown shaky about where I start my opinions. In the light of multiple narratives and interpretations, my own opinion seems already lacking before I even open my mouth.

That where I'm starting from is too narrow, too ignorant, too un-enlightened. 

Some of that comes from lack of confidence. 

Some of that comes from cringing from others' narrowness. 

Some of that comes from being jealous that others' are confident enough to express in the first place.

I'm afraid of being judged, so I stay silent. But if they were judging, they'd remarking on the silence anyways. Right?

Right? I'm not sure.